Effects of different training options on the basic movements physical fitness 4-year-old girls with different motor asymmetry

Keywords: motor, asymmetry, girls, pre-school


Purpose : to determine the effectiveness of different training options basic movements in terms of physical fitness girls with different orientation manual motor asymmetry (MMA). Material : the study involved 53 girls with ambidexterity: 68 - on the right, 62 - left oriented MMA. Age - 4 years. Results : there is a significant improvement in absolute muscle strength, speed-strength, coordination and cyclic locomotion tossing on the leading and non-leading range of hands regardless of the approach to teaching basic movements in girls. At the same time the increase of these qualities and the coordination of the throws on the accuracy of each hand is significantly higher when using one of the options "symmetric" approach. If you are using one of the options "symmetric" approach to teaching basic movements focus MMA defines the features of the development of physical qualities. Conclusions : regardless of the direction of MMA both versions of "symmetric" approach to improve the effectiveness of traditional indicators of physical fitness; the effectiveness of the first among themselves no different.


Download data is not yet available.

View Counter: Abstract | 69 | times, Article PDF |


Balac'ka L., Galamanzhuk L., Iedinak G. Osoblivosti rozvitku motorki ditej z riznoiu rukhovoiu asimetriieiu mizh 3 i 6 rokami [Features of motorboat children with varying motor asymmetry between 3 and 6 years old]. Visnik Prikarpats'kogo nacional'nogo universitetu, 2012, no.16, pp. 112-118. (in Ukrainian)

Bezrukikh M. M. [The functional hemispheric asymmetry and the lateralization of motor function]. Aktual'nye voprosy funkcional'noj mezhpolusharnoj asimmetrii [Actual questions of functional hemispheric asymmetry], 2003, pp. 27-28. (in Russian)

Bezrukikh M. M. Levorukij rebenok v shkole i doma [Left-handed child at school and at home], Ekaterinburg, Factors, 2004, 300 p. (in Russian)

Berdichevskaia E. M. Rol' funkcional'noj asimmetrii mozga v vozrastnoj dinamike dvigatel'noj deiatel'nosti cheloveka Dokt. Diss. [The role of functional brain asymmetry in the age dynamics of human motor activity Dokt. Diss.], Krasnodar, 1999, 50 p. (in Russian)

Galamanzhuk L. L. [Features of mental functions related to cognitive processes, in boys with different orientation manual motor asymmetry between 4 and 6 years]. Materials IX the International scientific and practical conference «The strategic questions of world science-2013»[Materialy IX Miedzynarodowej naukowi-praktycznej konferencji «Strategiczne pytania swiatowej nauki-2013»], Przemysl, Science and Studies, 2013, no.31, pp. 15––20. (in Polish)

Zhavoronkova L. A. Pravshi–levshi. Mezhpolusharnaia asimmetriia biopotencialov mozga cheloveka [Right-handed – left-handed. Hemispheric asymmetry of brain potentials man], Moscow, Ekoinvest, 2009, 240 p. (in Russian)

Leutin V. P., Nikolaeva E.I. Funkcional'naia asimmetriia mozga [Functional brain asymmetry], Sankt Petersburg, Speech, 2005, 276 p. (in Russian)

Liakh V. I. Dvigatel'nye sposobnosti shkol'nikov [Motor abilities of schoolchildren], Moscow, Terra-Sport, 2000, 241 p. (in Russian)

Moskvin V. A. Mezhpolusharnye otnosheniia i problema individual'nykh razlichij [Hemispheric relations and the problem of individual differences], Orenburg, IPK OSU, 2002, 288 p. (in Russian)

Panfilova N. V. Razvitie koordinacionnykh sposobnostej i obuchenie dvigatel'nym dejstviiam detej 4–6 let v sviazi s osobennostiami dvigatel'noj asimmetrii. Cand. Diss. [The development of coordination abilities and learning motor actions in children 4-6 years due to the nature of motor asymmetry. Cand. Diss.], Moscow, 1992, 19 p. (in Russian)

Silina E. A., Evtukh T. V. Mezhpolusharnaia asimmetriia i individual'nye razlichiia [Hemispheric asymmetry and individual differences], Perm, PGPU, 2004, 136 p. (in Russian)

Sirotiuk A. L. Nejropsikhologicheskoe i psikhofiziologicheskoe soprovozhdenie obucheniia [Neuropsychological and psychophysiological support learning ], Moscow, Sphere, 2003, 220 p. (in Russian)

DeVries, J. I. P., Wimmers R. H., Ververs I. A. P. Fetal Handedness and Head Position Preference: a Developmental Study. Developmental Psychology. 2001, no.39, pp. 171––178.

Jordy C. F. Lateral dominance in 182 children: the antimeres, the praxis, the structure-performance relation. Arg. Neuropsiquiatr. 1995, vol.53, no.3В, pp. 631––638.

Kuhl J., Kazen M. Hemispheric asymmetry: Does power beat wisdom? Seattle, Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, 2005, 467 p.

Lenneman, F. Raising a left-handed child. Brain and Cognition, 2009, no.59, pp. 384––388.

Mattay, V. S., Fera F., Tessitore A., Hariri A. R. Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in human motor function. Neurology, 2002, no.58, pp. 630––635.

Shabbott, B. A., Sainburg R. L. Differentiating between two models of motor lateralization. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2008, no.100, pp. 565––575.

Ramaley F. Inheritance of left-handedness. Chicago Journal, 2012, vol.47, no.564, pp. 730––738.

Vincent W. J. Statistic in kinesiology. Champaign, Human kinetics, 2005, 312 p.

How to Cite
Galamandjuk LL. Effects of different training options on the basic movements physical fitness 4-year-old girls with different motor asymmetry. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports. 2015;19(4):16-1. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2015.0403