Вплив мінливості і розподілу практики на навчання учня навичкам баскетбольного кидка
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2019.0102Ключові слова:
масова, практика, розподілена, змінна, постійнаАнотація
Мета: організація практики є важливим фактором в спортивному середовищі та освіті. Це дослідження було спрямоване на вивчення впливу мінливості і розподілу практики на навчання навичкам баскетбольного кидка серед учениць початкової школи. Матеріал: Виходячи з результатів 15 спроб (5 кидків з будь-яких відстаней 3, 3,5 і 4 метри) перед тестом, 90 учасників-добровольців були розподілені в 6 однорідних груп по 15 учасників (три групи з масованої практикою і три групи з розподіленою практикою ). з блокованими, зростаючими і спадними практиками). На етапі придбання учасники тренувалися по 9 сесій. Через 72 години всі учасники провели утримує тест. Змінивши кут на відстані 3,5 метра, тест перенесення було проведено в той же день. Результати. Результати показали, що мінливість і розподіл практики не впливають на результати учасників на етапах придбання, утримання та передачі. Висновки: для розвитку ефекту контекстної інтерференції мінливість параметрів моторної програми недостатня.Посилання
1. Magill RA, Anderson D. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. 11th Edition. Columbus OH: McGraw – Hill College; 2016.
2. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor learning and performance: from principles to application. 5th Edition. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics; 2014.
3. Fazel Kalkhoran A, Shariati A. The effects of contextual interference on learning volleyball motor skills. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2012; 12(4):550.
4. Battig WF. Facilitation and interference. in E A Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill. New York: Academic Press. 1966.
5. Battig W F. The flexibility of human memory. In: L S Cemark and F I M Craik. (Eds), Levels of processing in human memory. New Jersey: Hillsdale Publishers; 1979.
6. Shea JB, Zimny ST. Context effects in memory and learning movement information. Memory and Control of Action, 1983;12: 345-366.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61998-6
7. Maslovat D, Chus R, Lee T D, Franks IM. Contextual interference: single task versus multi-task learning. Motor Control, 2004; 8(2): 213-233.
https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.8.2.213
8. Goodwin JE, Grimes CR, Eckerson JM, Gordon PM. Effect of different quantities of variable practice on acquisition and retention and transfer of an applied motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1998; 87(1): 147-151.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.147
9. Travlos AK. Specificity and variability of practice, and contextual interference in acquisition and transfer of underhand volleyball serve. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2010; 110(1): 298- 312.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.1.298-312
10. Rahavi R, Shojaee M, Estiri Z, Naghizadeh H. The effect of two types of interference before performance and during performance on learning of generalized motor program and parameter in basketball fundamental skills. Journal of Development and Motor Learning, 2013; 2(12):107-124. (In Persian)
11. Pauwels L, Vancleef K, Swinnen S P, Beets I A M. Challenge to promote change: both young and older adults benefit from contextual interference. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2015; 7: 157.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00157
12. Correa UC, Walter C, Torriani-Pasin C, Barros JA, Tani G. Effects of the amount and schedule of varied practice after constant practice on the adaptive process of motor learning. Motricidade, 2014; 10(4):35-46.
13. Lotfi Gh, Khalaji H, Bahram A, Farrokhi A. Contextual interference effect on performance and learning of basketball free throw. Journal of Movement Science and Sport, 2006; 4(1):63-76. (In Persian)
14. Mokhtari Dinani M, Farrokhi A, Lotfi Gh, Nazarian A. The effect of variability of practice on the performance and learning of coordinated – coincident task. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 2013; 1(2):11-18. (In Persian)
15. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effect of various practice condition in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2004; 36(2): 212-224.
https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
16. Fromer R. Learning to throw: contributions of contextual interference and individual differences to the acquisition of a complex motor skill. Unpublished dissertation, Humboldt University of Berlin; 2016.
17. Guadagnoli MA, Holcomb WR, Weber TJ. The relationship between contextual interference effect and performer expertise on the learning of a putting task. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1999; 37(1): 19-36.
18. Pasand F, Fooladiyanzadeh H, Nazemzadegan Gh. The effect of gradual increase in contextual interference on acquisition, retention and transfer of volleyball skills. International Journal of Kinesiology and Sport Sciences, 2016; 4(2):72.
19. Garcia JA, Moreno FJ, Reina R, Menayo R, Fuentes JP. Analysis of effects of distribution of practice in learning and retention of a continuous and a discrete skill presented on computer. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2008; 107(1): 261-272.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.107.1.261-272
20. Leite C, Ugrinovitsch H, Carvalho M, Benda R N. Distribution of practice affect older, but not young adults’ motor skill learning. Human Movement, 2013; 14(1): 20-26.
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10038-012-0050-1
21. Dail TK, Christiana RW. Distribution of practice and met cognition in learning and long – term retention of a discrete motor task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2004; 75(2): 148-155.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2004.10609146
2. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor learning and performance: from principles to application. 5th Edition. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics; 2014.
3. Fazel Kalkhoran A, Shariati A. The effects of contextual interference on learning volleyball motor skills. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2012; 12(4):550.
4. Battig WF. Facilitation and interference. in E A Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill. New York: Academic Press. 1966.
5. Battig W F. The flexibility of human memory. In: L S Cemark and F I M Craik. (Eds), Levels of processing in human memory. New Jersey: Hillsdale Publishers; 1979.
6. Shea JB, Zimny ST. Context effects in memory and learning movement information. Memory and Control of Action, 1983;12: 345-366.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61998-6
7. Maslovat D, Chus R, Lee T D, Franks IM. Contextual interference: single task versus multi-task learning. Motor Control, 2004; 8(2): 213-233.
https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.8.2.213
8. Goodwin JE, Grimes CR, Eckerson JM, Gordon PM. Effect of different quantities of variable practice on acquisition and retention and transfer of an applied motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1998; 87(1): 147-151.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.87.1.147
9. Travlos AK. Specificity and variability of practice, and contextual interference in acquisition and transfer of underhand volleyball serve. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2010; 110(1): 298- 312.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.1.298-312
10. Rahavi R, Shojaee M, Estiri Z, Naghizadeh H. The effect of two types of interference before performance and during performance on learning of generalized motor program and parameter in basketball fundamental skills. Journal of Development and Motor Learning, 2013; 2(12):107-124. (In Persian)
11. Pauwels L, Vancleef K, Swinnen S P, Beets I A M. Challenge to promote change: both young and older adults benefit from contextual interference. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2015; 7: 157.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00157
12. Correa UC, Walter C, Torriani-Pasin C, Barros JA, Tani G. Effects of the amount and schedule of varied practice after constant practice on the adaptive process of motor learning. Motricidade, 2014; 10(4):35-46.
13. Lotfi Gh, Khalaji H, Bahram A, Farrokhi A. Contextual interference effect on performance and learning of basketball free throw. Journal of Movement Science and Sport, 2006; 4(1):63-76. (In Persian)
14. Mokhtari Dinani M, Farrokhi A, Lotfi Gh, Nazarian A. The effect of variability of practice on the performance and learning of coordinated – coincident task. Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 2013; 1(2):11-18. (In Persian)
15. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effect of various practice condition in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2004; 36(2): 212-224.
https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
16. Fromer R. Learning to throw: contributions of contextual interference and individual differences to the acquisition of a complex motor skill. Unpublished dissertation, Humboldt University of Berlin; 2016.
17. Guadagnoli MA, Holcomb WR, Weber TJ. The relationship between contextual interference effect and performer expertise on the learning of a putting task. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 1999; 37(1): 19-36.
18. Pasand F, Fooladiyanzadeh H, Nazemzadegan Gh. The effect of gradual increase in contextual interference on acquisition, retention and transfer of volleyball skills. International Journal of Kinesiology and Sport Sciences, 2016; 4(2):72.
19. Garcia JA, Moreno FJ, Reina R, Menayo R, Fuentes JP. Analysis of effects of distribution of practice in learning and retention of a continuous and a discrete skill presented on computer. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2008; 107(1): 261-272.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.107.1.261-272
20. Leite C, Ugrinovitsch H, Carvalho M, Benda R N. Distribution of practice affect older, but not young adults’ motor skill learning. Human Movement, 2013; 14(1): 20-26.
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10038-012-0050-1
21. Dail TK, Christiana RW. Distribution of practice and met cognition in learning and long – term retention of a discrete motor task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2004; 75(2): 148-155.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2004.10609146
##submission.downloads##
Опубліковано
2019-02-26
Як цитувати
1.
Lotfi G, Baghaeyan M, Baghaee N. Вплив мінливості і розподілу практики на навчання учня навичкам баскетбольного кидка. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports. 26, Лютий 2019;23(1):14-8. доступний у10.15561/18189172.2019.0102
Номер
Ліцензія
Copyright Holder - Author(s).
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: more
Statistics
Abstract views: 1770 / PDF downloads: 1063
