Digit ratio (2D:4D): relationship with freestyle swimming performance of adolescent well-trained swimmers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2019.0307

Keywords:

athlete, digit ratio, performance, sport, swimming

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a relationship between the digit ratios and freestyle swimming performance of adolescent well-trained swimmers. Material and Methods: Twenty-two well-trained male swimmers who had at least 3 years of swim training experience were recruited as participants. The participants’ mean age was 14.1±1.5 years, body height was 164.5±11.3 cm, and body mass was 54.4±11.2 kg. Participants’ body height, mass, index finger (2D) and ring finger (4D) lengths were measured and digit ratio (2D:4D) and body mass index of participants was calculated. To determine the swimming performance of participants, the short (50m and 100m) and middle (200m and 400m) distance freestyle time-trial swimming tests were performed on participants. The association between the 2D:4D ratio and the swimming performance were determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results. Our findings indicated that there were strong negative correlations (r > .50) between the mean of BMI and swimming times of adolescent swimmers. ( p > .05 ). However, result of this study revealed no relationship between the digit ratio (2D:4D) and swimming performance in adolescent swimmers. ( p > .05 ). Conclusion. As a result, it may be stated that the 2D:4D ratio of swimmers is not a major parameter in predicting swimming performance for adolescent swimmers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

G. Özen, Department of Physical Education and Sports Teaching, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

gokmenozen44@gmail.com; Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi 17000 Çanakkale, Turkey

Ö. Atar, Department of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

ozdemir@comu.edu.tr; Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi 17000 Çanakkale, Turkey

H. Koç, Department of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

hurmuzkoc@gmail.com; Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi 17000 Çanakkale, Turkey

References

1. Manning JT, Scutt D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DI. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentration of testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and oestrogen. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(11):3000– 4.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.11.3000

2. Longman D, Stock JT, Wells JC. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and rowing ergometer performance in males and females. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011;144(3):337- 41.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21407

3. Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P, Knickmeyer R, Manning JT. 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Hum Dev. 2004;77:23– 28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2003.12.002

4. McIntyre MH. The use of digit ratios as markers for perinatal androgen action. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2006;4: 10-20.

5. Muller DC, Giles GG, Bassett J, Morris HA, Manning JT, Hopper JL, et al. Second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) and concentrations of circulating sex hormones in adulthood. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2011;9:57.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-9-57

6. Tambe MK, Turankar AV., Lingawar S, Dhokane NB, Pophali NP, Kherde PM, Bajaj V. Influence of digit ratio (2D: 4D) on reaction time and athletic sprint performance: A short term pilot study. MedPulse International Journal of Physiology. 2018;5(2):17-21.

7. Liu TC, Kuo CH, Wang PS. Exercise and testosterone. Adaptive Medicine. 2009;1(1):26-31.

8. Voracek M. Special issue preamble: Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and individual differences research. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011;51(4): 367-70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.018

9. Bennett M, Manning JT, Cook CJ, Kilduff LP. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and performance in elite rugby players. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(13):1415-21.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2010.510143

10. Cardinale M, Stone MH. Is testosterone influencing explosive performance?. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(1):103-7.

11. Eler N, Eler S. 2D: 4D, Lateralization and Strength in Handball Players. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2018;6(5):170-8.
https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i5.3220

12. Kilduff L, Cook CJ, Bennett M, Crewther B, Bracken RM, Manning J. Right– left digit ratio (2D: 4D) predicts free testosterone levels associated with a physical challenge. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(6):677-83.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.747690

13. Celik A, Aksu F, Tunar M, Dasdan AEN, Topacoğlu H. Effects of digit ratio of master athletes on sporting achievement levels. DEÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010;24(3):89-93.

14. Honekopp J, Schuster M. A meta-analysis on 2D: 4D and athletic prowess: Substantial relationships but neither hand out-predicts the other. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010;48(1):4-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.009

15. Hull MJ, Schranz NK, Manning JT, Tomkinson GR. Relationships between digit ratio (2D: 4D) and female competitive rowing performance. Am J Hum Biol. 2015;27(2):157-63.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22627

16. Jurimae T, Voracek M, Jurimae J, Latt E, Haljaste K, Saar M, Purge P. Relationships between finger-length ratios, ghrelin, leptin, IGF axis, and sex steroids in young male and female swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;104(3):523-29.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0801-z

17. Ramos E, Frontera WR, Llopart A, Feliciano D. Muscle strength and hormonal levels in adolescents: gender related differences. Int J Sports Med. 1998;9(08):526-31.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-971955

18. Garcia‐Cruz E, Huguet J, Piqueras M, Ribal MJ, Alcaraz A. Second to fourth digit ratio, adult testosterone level and testosterone deficiency. BJU Int. 2012;109(2):266-71.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10249.x

19. Holzapfel SD, Chomentowski III PJ, Summers LAM, Sabin MJ. The relationship between digit ratio (2D:4D), VO2max, ventilatory threshold, and running performance. International Journal of Sports Sciences & Fitness. 2016;6(1):1-30.

20. Bescos R. Esteve M, Porta J, Mateu M, Irurtia A, Voracek M. Prenatal programming of sporting success: Associations of digit ratio (2D:4D), a putative marker for prenatal androgen action, with world rankings in female fencers, J Sports Sci. 2009;27(6):625-32.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802707029

21. Van Dongen S. Second to fourth digit ratio in relation to age, BMI and life history in a population of young adults: a set of unexpected results. Journal of Negative Results. 2009;6:1-7.

22. Balcı RS, Acıkgoz AK, Goker P, Bozkir MG. The Relationship of finger length ratios (2D:4D) with quantitative, verbal talent and anthropometric parameters. International Journal of Morphology. 2018;6(1):310-18.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022018000100310

23. Dyer M, Short SE, Short M, Manning JT, Tomkinson GR. Relationships between the second to fourth digit ratio (2D: 4D) and game‐related statistics in semi‐professional female basketball players. Am J Hum Biol. 2018;30(1):e23070.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23070

24. Smith DJ, Norris SR, Hogg JM. Performance evaluation of swimmers: scientific tools. Sports Med. 2002;32(9):539-54.
https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200232090-00001

25. Lombardo MP, Otieno S, Heiss A. College-aged women in the United States that play overhand throwing sports have masculine digit ratios. PloS One. 2018;13(9):e0203685.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203685

26. Peeters MW, Claessens AL. Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and competition level in world-class female gymnasts. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(12):1302-11.

27. Jia J. Research on the relationship of the digit ratio and the throwing ability of throwing athlete in sports undergraduate college. Bio Thecnology An Indian Journal. 2014;10(9):3698-703.

Downloads

Published: 2019-06-29

How to Cite

1.
Özen G, Atar Ö., Koç H. Digit ratio (2D:4D): relationship with freestyle swimming performance of adolescent well-trained swimmers. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports. 2019;23(3):150-4. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2019.0307

Issue

Section

Articles