The development of speed-power qualities of schoolchildren with different typologies applying coordination training

Keywords: speed-power qualities, differentiated approach, coordination of motion, schoolchildren, typology


Purpose : to determine the influence of coordination abilities on the development of speed-power qualities in 7-8 years old schoolchildren with a different type of nervous system. Material : the pedagogical experiment was conducted in a regular school and lasted 7 months. The study involved children 7-8 years old (n = 60). All schoolchildren were differentiated into 3 groups (in each group - n = 20). Coordination abilities were determined by the test “3x10 shuttle run”. Speed- power qualities were determined by the test “Standing Long Jump”. The strength of the nervous system was diagnosed according to the “Tapping test” method. Results : it was determined that it is necessary to develop the coordination abilities of 7-8 years old schoolchildren. It was determined the interrelation of coordination abilities and speed-power qualities. It was confirmed the effectiveness of a differentiated approach based on the typology of children. The results were realized at physical education lessons at school. Conclusion : it is recommended to develop coordination abilities during 12-15 minutes in physical education classes for schoolchildren. Such training will be more effective if consider the typology of the nervous system of schoolchildren.


Download data is not yet available.

View Counter: Abstract | 356 | times, Article PDF |

Author Biography

G.G. Polevoy, Vyatka State University; Moscow str., 36, Kirov, 610000, Russia


1. Dveyrina OA. Coordination capacities: definition, classification, forms. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta. 2014;35:35-38. (in Russian).

2. Lyakh VI, Sadowski J, Witkowski Z. Development of Coordination Motor Abilities (CMA) in the System of Long-Term Preparation of Athletes. Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism. 2011;3:187- 197.

3. Jaakkola J, Watt A, Kalaja S. Differences in the Motor Coordination Abilities Among Adolescent Gymnasts, Swimmers, and Ice Hockey Players. Human Movement. 2017;1:44- 50.

4. Starosta W, Hirtz P. Sensitive and critical periods of motor co-ordination development and its relation to motor learning. Journal of human kinetics. 2002;7:19-28.

5. Sporiš1 G, Šiljeg K, Mrgan J, Kević G. Self-evaluation of motor and functional abilities among pupils. Croatian Journal of Education. 2011;13(2): 66-81.

6. Bozdoğan TK, Kızılet A. The effect of coordination and plyometric exercises on agility, jumping and endurance ability in badminton players. International journal of sports exercise & training sciences. 2017;3(4):178- 187.

7. Holodov ZhK, Khuznetsov VS. Theory and methodics of physical training and sports. Moscow: Akademia; 2009. (in Russian)

8. Solomatin VR. Individual approach in elaborating the many-year training of young male swimmers. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta. 2010;61:103-107. (in Russian).

9. Santos S, Coutinho D, Gonçalves B, Schöllhorn W, Sampaio J, Leite N. Differential Learning as a Key Training Approach to Improve Creative and Tactical Behavior in Soccer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2018;89(1): 11- 24.

10. Khasawneh A. Prevailing Somatotypes and Their Contribution Rate to the Coordination Abilities among the Students of the Physical Education College. Physical Education. 2015;3:176- 187.

11. Fiorilli G, Mitrotasios M, Iuliano E, Calcagno G, Di Cagno A. Agility and change of direction in soccer: Differences according to the player ages. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2017;57(12):1597-1604.

12. Makarov YM, Hussain A-T. Typological profile of person properties of the basketball players aged 16-18 years old depending on the style of game activity. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta. 2011;73:122-4. (in Russian).

13. Drozdovski AK. The connection between typological complexes of properties of the nervous system, temperaments, and personality types in the professions and sports. Open access journal of sports medicine. 2015;6:72- 161.

14. Shklyar BM. Usage of statistical methods in the pedagogical researches. Science Rise. 2015;5:39.

15. Lyakh VI, Zdanevich AA. Work program on physical culture, grade 1-4. Moscow: Education; 2010. (in Russian).

16. Polevoy G. The spatial orientation of the players with different type of nervous system. International Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology. 2017;6(4):1- 6.

17. Polevoy G. The Development of the Ability to Equilibrium Football players 10-11 years with different Nervous System. Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2018;12(1):496-499.

18. Raigorodskiy DJ. Practical psychodiagnostics. Methodics and tests. Samara: Bakhrakh-M; 2017. (in Russian).

19. Clark-Carter D. Effect size and statistical power in psychological research. Irish Journal of Psychology, 2007;28:3- 12.

20. Kim TK. T test as a parametric statistic. Korean Journal of Anesthesiol. 2015;68(6):540– 546.

21. Jekauc D, Wagner MO, Herrmann C, Hegazy K, Woll A. Does Physical Self-Concept Mediate the Relationship between Motor Abilities and Physical Activity in Adolescents and Young Adults? PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):1- 18.
How to Cite
Polevoy G. The development of speed-power qualities of schoolchildren with different typologies applying coordination training. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports. 2019;23(1):43-6.