PECULIAR FEATURES OF MEN PHYSICAL CONDITION IN PLANNING HIGHLY INTENSIVE PHYSICAL LOADS IN WINTER PERIOD

Physical functioning of average and high intensity is an important component of mature men’s health and longevity. For highly intensive physical functioning organism’s physical fitness is required. Human physical condition can change under influence of season factors. Purpose: to determine specific features of men’s physical condition before their highly intensive physical trainings in winter period and test them. Material: 25 men of 35-48 years’ age without chronic diseases were chosen for experiment. All they observe healthy life style. Body mass index, physical condition by methodic of Bayevskie were tested. The research was conducted in the following way: in the morning and in the evening of every day. Physical functioning was tested by methodic IPAQ. Results: we registered confident (p<0.05) distinctions in men’s physical condition before and in the day of their highly intensive physical functioning. We noticed changes in the following: body weight, heart beats rate, adaptation potential of Bayevskiy. The most significant indicator was the marker. For testing of its effectiveness we offered for men to plan highly intensive physical functioning in compliance with this marker during one month. Result was confident (p<0.05) increase of duration and quantity of highly intensive physical trainings, improvement of physical condition by 3.13% in complex test of Bayevskiy. Conclusions: Consideration of men’s physical condition plays important role in planning their highly intensive physical functioning. Increment of Bayevskiy’s adaptation potential by 5.25% can be informative marker in winter period. It is a factor for highly intensive physical functioning planning for definite day.

for all population strata.As on to-day we have not found recommendations concerning PC role in season PF of mature age men.Researches [5, 11, 19, and 20] make us to consider it.
Purpose, tasks of the work, material and methods The purpose of the work is to determine specific features of men's physical condition before their highly intensive physical trainings.Such data can be used for current HIPF planning in winter period.
Organization and methods of the research: experiment consisted of two parts: laboratory and forming.We selected 25 men of 35-48 years' age without chronic diseases.All they observe healthy life style and independently practice HIPF in the form of health related run, swimming, trainings in gym.Physical condition of these men in testing days did not exceed average month standard of Bayevskiy's adaptation potential (APB) -1.80 absolute units (a.u.) [2].The research was conducted in the south of Ukraine in winter period during 30 days of laboratory and 30 days of forming experiment.
For studying of men's physical condition we tested body mass index (BMI), (kg/m 2 ).Assessment of physical condition was conducted twice a day: in the morning and in the evening by APB index.Body weight was measured with electronic balance (error up to 50 grams).Blood pressure and heart beats rate (HBR) were registered by automatic tonometers Contec 08A.APB was calculated every morning after night sleep and every evening before sleep according to appropriate recommendations of WHO (1999).HIPF was tested in compliance with international questionnaire IPAQ (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) [3].We studied quantity of trainings in a week and their duration.The received results were noted in individual diaries.Laboratory experiment included comparison of average month PC day indicators of men with indicators before and in day of HIPF.We compared indicators, registered in the morning (M) with indicators, registered in the evening (E) and difference between them during day (M-E) and in the night (E-M).Difference between PC indicators is presented in percents by formula: where, x -percentage; a -previous indicator; b -next indicator of compared pair of numbers.In case of HIPF registration during several days percentage was calculated only before the first day.
In laboratory experiment men practiced HIPF in usual for them mode.In forming experiment we offered to plan HIPF in compliance with morning information about their PC.Results of forming experiment were processed by weekly data.
Statistical calculation was carried out with the help of non-parametrical statistic, as far as some results did not comply with normal distribution.We determined the following: interquartile range (IR), median (Me).Comparison of indicators' groups was realized with Wilkes's criteria of sign ranks.Programs EXEL and Statgraphics16 were used.
Results of the research Comparing men's PC in ordinary days with PC in HIPF days (see table 1); we found significant distinctions in most of the tested indicators.In HIPF days weight (M) was confidently higher by 0.39%.HBR (M) was higher by 1.18%.APB (M) was higher by 3.61% while APB (E) -2.78%.There were no confident differences in change of APB during day (M-E) and in the night (E-M).The most important in finding of informative PC indicators were distinctions, registered before and in days of HIPF (see table 2).Body weight (M) was higher in HIPF days by 0.39%.HBR (M) was also higher by 1.96%.APB (M) was higher by 5.25% and APB (E) -by 3.93%.There were no distinctions between APB indicators during day (M-E) and in the night (E-M).Comparing PC indicators before HIPF days with ordinary days it is necessary to be sure that PC indicators, registered before HIPF were less then in ordinary days (see table 3).It was found that body weight (M), APB (E), difference in APB in day (M-E) and in the night (E-M) did not differ confidently (р>0.05).At the same time HBR (M) and APB (M) were confidently less than in ordinary days by 0.77% and 1.84% accordingly.It is proved by worsening of PC indicators just in the morning of HIPF day.
Comparative analysis of men's PC in HIPF days and in ordinary days resulted in certain differences.We used them for current planning of HIPF.In forming experiment men were offered to plan HIPF for days, when APB (M) increased more than by 5.25%, comparing with previous days.
As a result of forming experiment there appeared PC and PF positive changes in men (see table 4).

Discussion
In contingent, chosen for our research there was insignificant increase of BMI (by 10%).This fact can be related (with normal PC indicators) more to muscular tissue than to fat.APB was relatively normal.Morning HBR (M) also reflected healthy cardio-vascular system.HIPF was much less than recommended 75 minutes and less than 2 times a week.
Testing of PC changes in ordinary days and in HIPF days permitted to assess PF (by APB (E)) influence on men's organism and pre-conditions for HIPF trainings.Differences in PC were obvious by all tests, conducted in the morning (body weight, HBR, APB (M).Confident increase of body weight, HBR and APB before HIPF trainings can be explained by different factors of life activity.But increase of body weight in the morning, worsening of HBR indicators and APB witness about direct influence of eating increase.It also can witness about reduction of PF before.It generates extra energy in organism and stimulates men for HIPF.
Comparison of PC before HIPF days and in HIPF days proved our previous assumptions about body weight increase and relative worsening of PC indicators.Percent age of changes by PC tests was higher than in comparison with ordinary days.Complex test PC -APB (M) gave the highest percentage -5.25.It is purposeful to use this indicator ion current planning of HIPF.
Comparing PC indicators before HIPF with ordinary days witnessed that just before HIPF PC was better.It points at importance of PC exactly in that day.
Confident differences between APB morning-evening (M-E) and ordinary days were not found.It can witness about relatively adequate physical load of men's physical; condition in HIPF days and quick recreation of organism.Testing of APB in the evening of previous day and in the morning (E-M) showed stable recreational process during sleep in different days.That is why there were found no differences between them and ordinary days.
By results of forming experiment we can say that on consideration of APB (M) HIPF weekly quantity and duration depend.In its turn, such functioning optimally influences on men's PC in winter period.

Conclusions
Physical condition is very important for HIPF of mature age men.The most informative and acceptable for mass usage PC indicator can be APB (M).Its increase by 5.25% in winter period can be a reason for current planning of HIPF for this day.Consideration of this indicator is effective in optimization of mature men HIPF and PC.

Table 1 .
Comparison of men's PC indicators in ordinary days and in days with highly intensive physical functioning

Table 2 .
Comparison of PC indicators before and in days of highly intensive physical functioning

Table 3 .
Comparing of men's PC indicators before HIPF days with indicators of ordinary days днями

Table 4 .
Comparison of physical functioning and physical condition indicators in laboratory and forming BMI of men increased by1.12%.Quantity of HIPF trainings increased by 20.37%.Time of training increased by 26.92%.APB (M) also improved by 3.13%.